
The Bengal tiger is one of the better protected varieties -
but even that is in trouble
The cost of keeping tigers alive in the wild is
about $80m (£50m) per year, say conservationists
- but only about $50m (£30m) per year is being
pledged.
The figures come from a new assessment that
suggests targeting efforts in 42 selected
breeding sites.
Building tiger populations in these sites would
enable other areas to be re-populated later, the
researchers report in the journal PLoS Biology.
About 3,500 tigers remain in the wild, and only
about 1,000 breeding females.
Once found from Turkey to the eastern coast of
Russia, it is now concentrated in pockets of
South and East Asia, though even here it is
extinct in some countries such as Pakistan and
down to fewer than 50 individuals in others,
including Cambodia, China, Laos and Vietnam.
The animals are found in only about 7% of their
historical range.
But the new study suggests conservation would
benefit from concentrating efforts into still
smaller areas - specifically, into 42 "source
sites" that make up only about 6% of the tiger's
current range, or about 0.5% of the area it used
to span.
"The long-term goal is to conserve an Asia-wide
network of large landscapes where tigers can
flourish," said Nigel Leader-Williams from
Cambridge University, one of the scientists on
this study.
"The immediate priority, however, must be to
ensure that the few breeding populations still
in existence can be protected and monitored.
Without this, all other efforts are bound to
fail."
Summit issue
The figure of $82m per year is the cost of
safeguarding and monitoring populations in these
42 key sites.
All but 10 lie in India, Sumatra and the eastern
extremities of Russia.
"A number of these source sites are already in
protected areas," noted John Robinson, executive
vice-president for conservation
and science with
the Wildlife Conservation Society (WCS).
"However, in many of them the protection is
weak, and it would not take much to push them
over the edge," he told BBC News.
More than half of the figure is already being
provided by the range states themselves, by
international donors and by conservation groups.
But the shortfall is about $35m (£23m) - and
unless the money is found, this study concludes
the tigers will not endure across what remains
of its range.
The big hope this year is the Tiger Summit, to
be hosted by Russia's Prime Minister Vladimir
Putin in St Petersburg.
Originally slated for this week, it has been
postponed until November in the hope of
attracting a greater number of national leaders.
One of the facts they will consider is that
there are now many more tigers in captivity than
in the wild.
While that might seem to indicate how far the
creature is from its natural place in the world,
Dr Robinson prefers to find a glimmer of
optimism.
"It says something about the fact that tigers
can breed easily, if you can protect them," he
said.
"They do this in captivity; and if we can
protect them in the wild too, they can bounce
back."
|